Comments for Case POD2007-00217

Case Number:POD2007-00217
Case Name:Arco Iris Latino Mart
Review Type:Original Plan
Case Description:Arco Iris Latino Mart
Parcel ID: 773-747-8402
6111 STAPLES MILL RD
Legal Description:EL STAPLES MILL RD AC .864 97 B1 83
Engineer/Applicant: BARTHOL DESIGN ASSOC
Project Case Number:POD2007-00217 (There are 6 related cases)
Project Name:ARCO IRIS LATINO MART

Note: The County of Henrico is not responsible for any information placed in the "Comments" field by the public.

POD2007-00217 - Arco Iris Latino Mart - Original Plan
First Submission Activity

DescriptionSubmission DateDue DateCompleted DateStatusReviewer
(1005) Review Initiated    11/05/2007 DONE  Welton, Pamela T. 
Comments:
--
(1115) DPW - Traffic Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/21/2007 CMTS  Jennings, Mike 
Comments:

PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - JENNINGS, MIKE

will be attached to review engineer comments



(1120) DPW - Design Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/26/2007 CMTS  Loving, Charles 
Comments:

PUBLIC WORKS - REVIEW ENGINEER - LOVING, CHARLES

_________

Please see the attached file(s) for more comments:
     TRA_6111_Staples_Mill_Road_Acro_Iris_6NOV07.DOC(Traffic)
     ENV___Arco_Iris_Latino_Mart___7nov07.DOC(Environmental)
     ENG____Arco_Iris_Latino_Mart___SD___16nov07.DOC(Engineering)
[Please Note: To view the file(s) you must have the correct software installed. If unable to obtain this, please contact the Reviewer or the Department of Planning for a hard copy of the comments.]

(1125) DPW - Environmental Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/21/2007 CMTS Jackson, Scott 
Comments:

PUBLIC WORKS - ENVIRONMENTAL - JACKSON, SCOTT

See the DPW Review Engineer comment section for the Environmental
Division comment attachment.




(1130) DPU Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/27/2007 CMTS Christian, Alvin 
Comments:

DPU - CHRISTIAN, ALVIN

Please see the attached file(s) for more comments:
     Arco_Iris_Latino_Market.PDF
     Material_Notes.DOC
[Please Note: To view the file(s) you must have the correct software installed. If unable to obtain this, please contact the Reviewer or the Department of Planning for a hard copy of the comments.]

(1135) Recreation and Parks Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/15/2007 DONE Soldano, Mary Ann 
Comments:

REC & PARKS - SOLDANO, MARY ANN

Please see the attached file(s) for more comments:
     CG11907POD79_07LatinoMart.DOC(POD79-07ArcoIris)
[Please Note: To view the file(s) you must have the correct software installed. If unable to obtain this, please contact the Reviewer or the Department of Planning for a hard copy of the comments.]

(1140) VDOT Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/21/2007 DONE Greulich, Anthony 
Comments:
*Closed by Henrico IT Admin per Tony Greulich in Planning on 12/17/2015 04:46:06 PM*
(1145) Dominion Power Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/21/2007 DONE Greulich, Anthony 
Comments:
*Closed by Henrico IT Admin per Tony Greulich in Planning on 05/08/2017 10:56:48 AM*
(1150) Planning Department Review  11/05/2007 11/26/2007 11/27/2007 DONE Goggin, Christina 
Comments:

PLANNING - GOGGIN, CHRISTINA

Additional Comments: Additional Comments for Arco Iris Latino Mart: POD-79-07

1) Cover Sheet:
?     Site data item # 5 - Acreage shown does not match acreage
according to real estate. This figure must include
both parcel totals.
?      Site data item # 8.A. should include POD-41-73 as a previous
approval for these parcels.
?     Site data item # 12.A. Building square footage does not match
the square footage indicated in parking calculations
under item #10: Parking Schedule.
?     Site data item # 12.C. Please clarify basis for number of
units.
2) Show all existing easements, including the 50? ingress/egress
easement to the Haskell
property along the north property line.
3) Delineate property lines appropriately.
4) If the property line shown between the market and the proposed
building is to be
eliminated, please label accordingly. If not, provide evidence
of a joint ingress/egress
maintenance agreement. Also, you must show independent parking
calculations and
setbacks for each building on each parcel if this is to remain
two parcels.
5) Verify the location of all property lines. These do not match
information indicated in
the County?s information system.
6) Is there sidewalk existing for the entire frontage of these
parcels along Staples Mill
Road? If so, show on plans. If not, it must be provided.
7) If traffic permits, eliminate double entrance for the market and
replace with one
central driveway to serve both buildings. This will increase
the area available for
parking.
8) As proposed, parking provided meets minimum requirements. No
medical
office use will be permitted on site. Staff encourages the
applicant to consider
increasing parking provided.
9) Relocate the dumpster to either side of the parking lot, thereby
located behind the
building and blocked from view of Staples Mill Road. This may
also increase
available parking.
10) Clarify whether the courtyard area is included in the square
footage.
11) Provide clarification regarding the function of the courtyard
area. No outdoor food
service is permitted in the B-1 zone. Tables would only be
permitted for convenience
seating.
12) Provide information on HVAC equipment location and screening
detail.
13) Screening for dumpster must be constructed of masonry such as
stone, brick, or split
face block and must match the principal building color.
14) Provide retaining wall material detail. This must also be block
or stone to match the
dumpster enclosure and building color.
15) Color architectural renderings are requested.
16) Provide an increased amount and symmetrical layout of windows
along all
elevations, particularly along Staples Mill Road.
17) Staff recommends locating the kitchen to the rear of the
building. At minimum, false
windows must be provided along the Staples Mill side of the
building, and this may
prove to be more difficult with the current layout. Perhaps
shift the bathrooms to the
front of the building to compensate.
18) Offices located on the second floor also need more windows,
especially along the
north elevation.
19) Landscaping and lighting are not part of this approval. Exterior
light fixtures and
courtyard landscaping shown are for information/schematic
purposes only.
20) Signage is not part of this approval. A separate sign permit
must be applied for.
21) Verify that the owner information indicated on the POD
application matches the
owner information according to County Real E
(130) Building Inspections Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/08/2007 APPR  Gordon, Richard T 
Comments:
--
(140) Division of Fire Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/07/2007 CMTS  Rastegar, Abdol Russell 
Comments:

FIRE - RASTEGAR, RUSSELL

Hydrants must be within a 350-ft. hose lay of the building circumference, a minimum of 50 ft. from the structure wall and accessible to fire department apparatus. Measure hose as laid from apparatus.

Additional Comments ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
1-     Please verify the location of the DFH for our review.
2-     Please verify the location of the FDC for our review.
3-     Please submit ISO Calculation to see how many FH is required.
4-     Please show the location of FH.
5-     Max. hose lay shall not be more than 350 feet the way the
apparatus travel.


(170) Division of Police Review  11/05/2007 11/21/2007 11/26/2007 CMTS  Vann, Kimberly 
Comments:

POLICE - VANN, KIMBERLY

Please see the attached file(s) for more comments:
     Arco_Iris_Latino_Mart.DOC
[Please Note: To view the file(s) you must have the correct software installed. If unable to obtain this, please contact the Reviewer or the Department of Planning for a hard copy of the comments.]

POD2007-00217 - Arco Iris Latino Mart - Original Plan
General Menu

DescriptionSubmission DateDue DateCompleted DateStatusReviewer
(A010) Application Received    10/12/2007  Moffett, Billy 
Comments:
--
(A025) Enterprise Zone    10/12/2007  Moffett, Billy 
Comments:
--

*This site contains Comments made after February 1, 2007

If you would like to view comments prior to Feb 1 2007, please contact the Planning Department at 804-501-4602.