Case Number: | POD2007-00217 |
---|---|
Case Name: | Arco Iris Latino Mart |
Review Type: | Original Plan |
Case Description: | Arco Iris Latino Mart |
Parcel ID: | 773-747-8402 6111 STAPLES MILL RD |
Legal Description: | EL STAPLES MILL RD AC .864 97 B1 83 |
Engineer/Applicant: | BARTHOL DESIGN ASSOC |
Project Case Number: | POD2007-00217 (There are 6 related cases) |
Project Name: | ARCO IRIS LATINO MART |
Note: The County of Henrico is not responsible for any information placed in the "Comments" field by the public.
POD2007-00217 - Arco Iris Latino Mart - Original Plan
First Submission Activity
Description | Submission Date | Due Date | Completed Date | Status | Reviewer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(1005) Review Initiated | DONE | Welton, Pamela T. | |||
Comments: -- | |||||
(1115) DPW - Traffic Review | CMTS | Jennings, Mike | |||
Comments: PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING - JENNINGS, MIKE will be attached to review engineer comments | |||||
(1120) DPW - Design Review | CMTS | Loving, Charles | |||
Comments: PUBLIC WORKS - REVIEW ENGINEER - LOVING, CHARLES _________ Please see the attached file(s) for more comments: TRA_6111_Staples_Mill_Road_Acro_Iris_6NOV07.DOC(Traffic) ENV___Arco_Iris_Latino_Mart___7nov07.DOC(Environmental) ENG____Arco_Iris_Latino_Mart___SD___16nov07.DOC(Engineering) [Please Note: To view the file(s) you must have the correct software installed. If unable to obtain this, please contact the Reviewer or the Department of Planning for a hard copy of the comments.] | |||||
(1125) DPW - Environmental Review | CMTS | Jackson, Scott | |||
Comments: PUBLIC WORKS - ENVIRONMENTAL - JACKSON, SCOTT See the DPW Review Engineer comment section for the Environmental Division comment attachment. | |||||
(1130) DPU Review | CMTS | Christian, Alvin | |||
Comments: DPU - CHRISTIAN, ALVIN Please see the attached file(s) for more comments: Arco_Iris_Latino_Market.PDF Material_Notes.DOC [Please Note: To view the file(s) you must have the correct software installed. If unable to obtain this, please contact the Reviewer or the Department of Planning for a hard copy of the comments.] | |||||
(1135) Recreation and Parks Review | DONE | Soldano, Mary Ann | |||
Comments: REC & PARKS - SOLDANO, MARY ANN Please see the attached file(s) for more comments: CG11907POD79_07LatinoMart.DOC(POD79-07ArcoIris) [Please Note: To view the file(s) you must have the correct software installed. If unable to obtain this, please contact the Reviewer or the Department of Planning for a hard copy of the comments.] | |||||
(1140) VDOT Review | DONE | Greulich, Anthony | |||
Comments: *Closed by Henrico IT Admin per Tony Greulich in Planning on 12/17/2015 04:46:06 PM* | |||||
(1145) Dominion Power Review | DONE | Greulich, Anthony | |||
Comments: *Closed by Henrico IT Admin per Tony Greulich in Planning on 05/08/2017 10:56:48 AM* | |||||
(1150) Planning Department Review | DONE | Goggin, Christina | |||
Comments: PLANNING - GOGGIN, CHRISTINA Additional Comments: Additional Comments for Arco Iris Latino Mart: POD-79-07 1) Cover Sheet: ? Site data item # 5 - Acreage shown does not match acreage according to real estate. This figure must include both parcel totals. ? Site data item # 8.A. should include POD-41-73 as a previous approval for these parcels. ? Site data item # 12.A. Building square footage does not match the square footage indicated in parking calculations under item #10: Parking Schedule. ? Site data item # 12.C. Please clarify basis for number of units. 2) Show all existing easements, including the 50? ingress/egress easement to the Haskell property along the north property line. 3) Delineate property lines appropriately. 4) If the property line shown between the market and the proposed building is to be eliminated, please label accordingly. If not, provide evidence of a joint ingress/egress maintenance agreement. Also, you must show independent parking calculations and setbacks for each building on each parcel if this is to remain two parcels. 5) Verify the location of all property lines. These do not match information indicated in the County?s information system. 6) Is there sidewalk existing for the entire frontage of these parcels along Staples Mill Road? If so, show on plans. If not, it must be provided. 7) If traffic permits, eliminate double entrance for the market and replace with one central driveway to serve both buildings. This will increase the area available for parking. 8) As proposed, parking provided meets minimum requirements. No medical office use will be permitted on site. Staff encourages the applicant to consider increasing parking provided. 9) Relocate the dumpster to either side of the parking lot, thereby located behind the building and blocked from view of Staples Mill Road. This may also increase available parking. 10) Clarify whether the courtyard area is included in the square footage. 11) Provide clarification regarding the function of the courtyard area. No outdoor food service is permitted in the B-1 zone. Tables would only be permitted for convenience seating. 12) Provide information on HVAC equipment location and screening detail. 13) Screening for dumpster must be constructed of masonry such as stone, brick, or split face block and must match the principal building color. 14) Provide retaining wall material detail. This must also be block or stone to match the dumpster enclosure and building color. 15) Color architectural renderings are requested. 16) Provide an increased amount and symmetrical layout of windows along all elevations, particularly along Staples Mill Road. 17) Staff recommends locating the kitchen to the rear of the building. At minimum, false windows must be provided along the Staples Mill side of the building, and this may prove to be more difficult with the current layout. Perhaps shift the bathrooms to the front of the building to compensate. 18) Offices located on the second floor also need more windows, especially along the north elevation. 19) Landscaping and lighting are not part of this approval. Exterior light fixtures and courtyard landscaping shown are for information/schematic purposes only. 20) Signage is not part of this approval. A separate sign permit must be applied for. 21) Verify that the owner information indicated on the POD application matches the owner information according to County Real E | |||||
(130) Building Inspections Review | APPR | Gordon, Richard T | |||
Comments: -- | |||||
(140) Division of Fire Review | CMTS | Rastegar, Abdol Russell | |||
Comments: FIRE - RASTEGAR, RUSSELL Hydrants must be within a 350-ft. hose lay of the building circumference, a minimum of 50 ft. from the structure wall and accessible to fire department apparatus. Measure hose as laid from apparatus. Additional Comments ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 1- Please verify the location of the DFH for our review. 2- Please verify the location of the FDC for our review. 3- Please submit ISO Calculation to see how many FH is required. 4- Please show the location of FH. 5- Max. hose lay shall not be more than 350 feet the way the apparatus travel. | |||||
(170) Division of Police Review | CMTS | Vann, Kimberly | |||
Comments: POLICE - VANN, KIMBERLY Please see the attached file(s) for more comments: Arco_Iris_Latino_Mart.DOC [Please Note: To view the file(s) you must have the correct software installed. If unable to obtain this, please contact the Reviewer or the Department of Planning for a hard copy of the comments.] |
POD2007-00217 - Arco Iris Latino Mart - Original Plan
General Menu
Description | Submission Date | Due Date | Completed Date | Status | Reviewer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A010) Application Received | Moffett, Billy | ||||
Comments: -- | |||||
(A025) Enterprise Zone | Moffett, Billy | ||||
Comments: -- |
*This site contains Comments made after February 1, 2007
If you would like to view comments prior to Feb 1 2007, please contact the Planning Department at 804-501-4602.